Supreme Court Rejected Texas Lawsuit: What Now?

President Trump and his legal team have lost at every turn in the fight to get a court to listen to evidence of fraud. Yesterday, the Supreme Court dealt a huge blow to the effort – they rejected the Texas lawsuit that many other states had joined. In a 7-2 ruling, they bowed out of the election fight, using a technicality that kept them from not even hearing the arguments. But the ruling was on a “standing” issue, not a merit issue. The ruling that rejected the lawsuit was short and somewhat terse:

The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.

Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins: In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___ (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.

Supreme Court ruling

Some legal experts said that the Texas case was flawed from the beginning and unlikely to succeed. But Trump attorney Rudy Guiliani says they will move on to other channels, even as the radical Democrats squeal with delight over the loss.

“The case wasn’t rejected on the merits, the case was rejected on standing. So the answer to that is to bring the case now to the district court by the president, by some of the electors, alleging some of the same facts where there would be standing and therefore get a hearing…The president’s reaction is to look at other options. I mean, we always knew that this was an option, that we would have to convert this into — in fact, originally, we thought about this as possibly four or five separate cases. So that is the option we are going to have to go to. There’s nothing that prevents us from filing these cases immediately in the district court in which the president, of course, would have standing, some of the electors would have standing in that their constitutional rights have been violated…We’re not finished. Believe me.”

Rudy Guiliani

Texas GOP chairman Allen West made the statement that the Supreme Court decision had ramifications far beyond 2020. It left room for states to do whatever they wished in violation of the Constitution. He also suggested that “law abiding states” should band together. It may come to that. Seventeen states, 106 GOP Congress members are now under attack by radical Democrats for taking a stand against the fraud.

Can you see how the leftists have flipped the narrative? This House member has demanded that Nancy Pelosi refuse to seat any GOP members who have fought the fraud, calling them traitors (Fox). He is claiming the Constitution as his grounds. He wants Dems to have total control over everything.

The fact is, attempting to overturn an election that was riddled with “irregularities” is not wrong. America, we are headed in all the wrong directions. Pascrell has also called for prosecution of President Trump and all of his supporters. Lock and load.


Featured photo: file

Sign up for our Uncle Sam’s Misguided Children newsletter and check out our shop while you’re there! Our website link has been censored on Facebook and Instagram, so be sure to visit us on the web or Twitter, Parler, and Me We for our op-eds on the news. Our new Instagram account is here.